If 9/11 “Truthers” are wacky for believing the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government, what about the conspiracy theorists who tried to convince Americans that 9/11 was orchestrated by Saddam Hussein?
For starters, the 9/11 Truth conspiracists have arguably more circumstantial evidence for their case than men like Stephen Hayes or Dick Cheney ever did for theirs. But the most significant difference is that while 9/11 Truthers are relegated to the internet with no mainstream media support, 9/11 Saddam Hussein conspiracists like Hayes were the media, and worked in conjunction with the government to perpetrate their fraud.
4 Comments
9/11 “truth” is much larger than simply those that theorize about criminal conspiracies. The “truth” is that SCIENCE is behind most of the 911 Truth community.
There is no conspiracy proposed by pointing out that the science shows the WTC buildings were blown up with explosives. It is simply a truth. The science proves it, and it is not circumstantial. It is hardly a theory either – as the mountain of physical evidence, experimentation, and mathematical physics formulas pretty much prove it.
We don’t call the “round earth” community “conspiracy theorists”. It is high time we stop calling the researchers and scientists investigating the physical evidence from 911 grade school names like “wacky”.
627 architects and engineers have come to the conclusion that WTC 1,2 and 7 did not free fall from fire damage as the 911 commission report states. These people are not “kooks”. They are concerned professionals looking for the truth.
Please look at their website http://www.ae911truth.org .
Everyone with half a brain agrees that Iraq and S. Hussein had nothing to do with 911.
Uhhh……..Let me get this straight.
Your conspiracy theroy is that the Bush administration would lie to kill 5000+ U.S. troops and over one million Iraqi’s.
But they are not lieing about killing 3000 people on 9-11.
This article is right on! Anyone that looks at the evidence knows that 9/11 was staged.